Lori Marks-Esterman

Some of Lori’s notable representations include serving as lead trial counsel for:

• Brought an action in Delaware Court of Chancery against primary health care provider Cano Health, Inc. whose stock price plummeted by 92% in the years following its IPO. In 2023, Olshan clients Elliot Cooperstone and Lewis Gold (together with Barry Sternlicht, plaintiffs), former directors of Cano and 35% shareholders, filed a complaint and motion for expedited proceedings against the company and its board in the Delaware Court of Chancery, seeking an injunction to reopen the company’s window for director nominations and shareholder proposals due to material events that occurred and material information that came to light after the nomination window closed. A withhold campaign was launched in tandem with the litigation. Plaintiffs alleged the company and its affiliates had engaged in a series of conflicted transactions with the CEO and members of his immediate family and that after the nomination window closed, the balance of the board formed a special committee intentionally designed to usurp the power of the full board, which precipitated Plaintiffs’ campaign. After securing a motion to expedite, Olshan’s team completed discovery in less than three weeks, including seven depositions. The parties submitted approximately 250 exhibits in advance of the hearing. Although the court denied Plaintiffs’ motion, finding that under Delaware law, the alleged conduct did not constitute “fundamental changes in the operation and management” of the company, the combined efforts of the litigation and withhold campaign were successful. At the annual meeting, over 80% of shareholders voting withheld votes from the company’s nominees for re-election. Further, the conflicted CEO was forced to step down effective immediately.
• Olshan client Strategic Investment Opportunities LLC (SIO) brought two proceedings in the Delaware Court of Chancery in its effort to nominate a slate of directors at the annual meeting of Lee Enterprises, Inc. (Lee). In the first litigation, SIO alleged breach of fiduciary duty against the Lee board and sought expedited injunctive relief. In less than a week, after Olshan completed expedited discovery, seven depositions, expert reports, and pre-trial briefs, the trial was held. The court found for the defendants, finding that SIO had not complied with Lee’s advance notice bylaws. Although SIO did not prevail on its claim, the case is important because it clarifies the standard of review applicable to a board’s conduct in a contested election. In the second litigation (Lee II), SIO challenged Lee and the board’s use of the plurality voting standard at the upcoming annual meeting election, alleging the nominations were invalid, a position the court upheld. Thereafter, following briefing and oral argument, the court denied SIO’s motion to expedite and for a temporary restraining order, holding that SIO could pursue its claims following the annual meeting. The court reasoned that SIO had stated colorable claims that the application of a plurality voting standard where only incumbents were running was inconsistent with the bylaws but did not grant the relief sought in view of the imminent meeting date. To our knowledge, Lee II is the first time the court has interpreted a bylaw requiring a majority voting standard in an uncontested election.
• Successfully represented Kingstown Partners Master Ltd. (Kingstown) in an §1782 application to the Southern District of New York seeking discovery from multiple corporate respondents to support a Cayman Islands appraisal proceeding in connection with a $2.7 billion merger. Kingstown and other dissenting shareholders alleged multiple conflicts of interest In re Kingstown Partners Master Ltd., No. 21-MC-691-LTS (S.D.N.Y. April 8, 2022). The 1872 application was necessary because Cayman courts lack jurisdiction to order discovery from foreign-domiciled third parties in appraisal proceedings. The court (Hon. L. Swain) rejected the respondents arguments that Kingstown was seeking to circumvent foreign restrictions on evidence and that the discovery requests were unduly broad and irrelevant to the fair value determination and found in our client’s favor, granting all written discovery Kingston sought. This decision has important precedential value given the increasing frequency of litigation over international business transactions, and the increasing potency of § 1782 as a tool for litigants.

• Successfully represented FrontFour Capital Group LLC and FrontFour Master Fund, Ltd., in a class action brought on behalf of the shareholders of Medley Capital Corporation (MCC) in a highly expedited trial in the Delaware Court of Chancery that concluded that MCC’s board had breached its fiduciary duty in approving a merger transaction with MCC’s affiliates, Medley Management, Inc. and Sierra Income Corporation, and enjoined the pending transaction.
• Represented Israeli company Paltop Advanced Dental Solutions Ltd. and its founder Sam Topaz in a bitterly fought company-control battle with the officers and directors of Keystone Dental, Inc., the Delaware company Paltop had merged with. The new merger was to be governed equally by Paltop and Keystone representatives, and Paltop, was to be run by Topaz, however, soon thereafter Keystone’s officers and directors took aggressive and unlawful actions to freeze Topaz out. Olshan filed a motion for a status quo order seeking expedited relief in the Delaware Court of Chancery, which restored company governance to the status quo as it existed before the defendants’ unlawful activities.
• Represented former shareholders of a Cayman public company who were exercising their statutory appraisal rights under Cayman Islands law in a going-private transaction valued in excess of $4 billion. We filed three separate federal actions – in New York, California and Florida - pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 seeking discovery for use in the underlying foreign appraisal proceeding. We were successful in each action and obtained critical discovery from key targets for use in the appraisal proceeding.

• Successfully represented shareholder activist client Potomac Capital Partners II LP (Potomac) in defending claims in the Delaware Court of Chancery, which alleged that Potomac had aided and abetted alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by the directors of PLX Technology Inc. The Court of Chancery awarded judgment in Potomac’s favor, and the Supreme Court of Delaware affirmed.

News

Speaking Engagements

Publications

Alerts

Honors & Recognitions

• Named a “Leading Lawyer” in Litigation: General Commercial by Chambers USA, 2021 – 2024
• Fellow of Litigation Counsel of America, the prestigious, invitation-only trial lawyer honorary society. Membership is limited to 3,500 fellows, representing less than one-half of one percent of American lawyers  
• Named a "Notable Litigator & Trial Attorney" by Crain's New York Business, 2025
• Named to the “New York Business’ Notable Leaders in Accounting, Consulting & Law” by Crain’s New York Business, 2024
• Named among the “Notable Diverse Leaders in Law” by Crain’s New York Business, 2022
• Named among the “Notable Women in Law” by Crain’s New York Business, 2018 and 2020
• Honored as a “Leading Lady” at the Third Annual Mann Charitable Foundation Event, 2019
• Consistently named to the New York Metro Super Lawyers list since 2013
• Recognized among the “Top Women Attorneys” in the New York Metro Area by Super Lawyers since 2013
• Awarded “Deal of the Year” and “Activist Campaign of the Year” by The Deal for representation of George Feldenkreis in his nomination of directors and successful unsolicited acquisition of Perry Ellis

Professional

• Litigation Counsel of America
• New York City Bar Association
• 100 Women in Finance
• Co-Founder, Women in Alternatives, a senior-level women’s group focused on advancing the interests of professional women in the alternative investment space

Blog Posts